WWW The Thinkery
Tuesday, April 10, 2007
(9:55 AM) | Stephen:
North Korea News

Immediately after the most recent agreement with North Korea regarding its nuclear programs, the North Korean government demanded that approximately $25 million in frozen funds at a Macau bank be released for its use. The US used - wait for it - "a little-known provision in the Patriot Act" to freeze the funds from the US financial system, including any entities connected to US-held financial institutions. So while there was no legal freeze of the money, it was effectively frozen because of how the world's financial systems depend upon the United States.

The US held its ground for quite a while, saying that the funds were examples of North Korean counterfeiting. This idea that North Korea is a notorious counterfeiter, like all accusations made against authoritarian governments in this country, was quickly accepted as a known fact.

Except, of course, that it isn't. The bank in question, Banco Delta Asia, has dealt with North Korea for a while, and made a habit of sending large amounts of US currency to the New York branch of HSBC, which has sophisticated scanning equipment used expressly to find counterfeit currency. The last time any counterfeits were discovered was back in 1994, and the bank immediately made the discovery public and dealt with the situation.

Once again there just doesn't seem to be any "there" there. How typical of the Bush administration to make unfounded accusations in order to gum up the works of agreements our government is bound to honor, but that the Bushies consider to be politically damaging to their base. Remember, right-wingers were not that happy when Christopher Hill announced that the US was agreeing, again, to provide fuel and food aid to North Korea in exchange for them shutting down their nuclear program.

It's also very interesting to note that the deadline for shutting down the plutonium-producing reactor is this coming Saturday. The funds, which North Korea has said are required before they will continue with their end of the agreement, have been frozen despite evidence they should be released until now. What interests me is to see, first, whether North Korea will be able to completely shut down the reactor in time and second, assuming they don't, if the US will use their "intransigence" and "refusal to follow the agreement" as an excuse to further punish them with frozen funds, sanctions, or even a complete dissolution of the agreement.



<< Home
About The Thinkery
Site feed

Recent Entries
Will No One Rid Us Of This Monster?
Biodynamics In A Bottle
Bill Richardson in North Korea
Let's All Join In: Calm Down, Mr. President
This Is Why The English Are Better Than Us
More Stupidity From Opinion Journal
Blog Against Theocracy
Friday Of Holy Week
Supporting The Troops
Bad Move, Governor Richardson

Contributors

Stephen

Blogroll
Ezra Klein
Slacktivist
Eschaton
litbrit
Harp and Sword
Shakesville
Brilliant At Breakfast
In This Moment
Theologoumenon
Adversaria
Faith and Theology
Theology and Biblical Studies
Internet Monk
Boar's Head Tavern
Jesus Creed
Sacra Doctrina
Khora
Maggi Dawn
Shadows of Divine Things
Chrisendom
Leithart
Foolish Sage
Per Caritatem
James K.A. Smith
Theoloblog
The Ethical Werewolf
A Pedestrian View
Brilliant At Breakfast

Archives
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
October 2006
November 2006
December 2006
January 2007
February 2007
March 2007
April 2007
May 2007
June 2007
July 2007
August 2007
September 2007
October 2007
November 2007
December 2007
March 2008
January 2075

Powered by Blogger

My Ecosystem Details>